User Tools

Site Tools


thesis:book-journals:eye-mind

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
thesis:book-journals:eye-mind [2018/08/26 00:33]
avnerus
thesis:book-journals:eye-mind [2018/08/26 00:38] (current)
avnerus
Line 42: Line 42:
 //"we were enabled eventually to find the limits of construction,​ to understand that space //"we were enabled eventually to find the limits of construction,​ to understand that space
 does not have three dimensions or more or fewer, as an animal has either four or two feet, and to understand that the three dimensions are does not have three dimensions or more or fewer, as an animal has either four or two feet, and to understand that the three dimensions are
-taken by different systems of measurement from a single ​dimension-ality, a polymorphous Being, which justifies all without being fully+taken by different systems of measurement from a single ​dimensionality, a polymorphous Being, which justifies all without being fully
 expressed by any. Descartes was right in setting space free. His mistake was to erect it into a positive being, outside all points of view, beyond expressed by any. Descartes was right in setting space free. His mistake was to erect it into a positive being, outside all points of view, beyond
 all latency and all depth, having no true thickness [épaisseur]"//​ all latency and all depth, having no true thickness [épaisseur]"//​
Line 50: Line 50:
  
   * I will add to that - vision is an action, a fleshy interaction,​ it's non linear, it's even multi sensory. **No VR experience can mimic the flesh of the world.**   * I will add to that - vision is an action, a fleshy interaction,​ it's non linear, it's even multi sensory. **No VR experience can mimic the flesh of the world.**
-  * Descartes' ​though ​of perception relies on some our ability to measure space through experience, in relation to our objective bodyBut how do we conceive this space in the first place? Merleau-Ponty claims that there is a primal intuition that comes from the fact that our thought acts **through** the body and not in relation to it, that allows us to found knowledge of spatial dimensions. However, as opposed to [[https://​www.youtube.com/​watch?​v=8_B-OLUVyfc|Princes Elizabeth'​s pursue]], the nature of this intuition is so primal that it cannot be conceived as a true thought. But that doesn'​t mean we cannot discuss it and speak of it, as Descartes refused to do.+  * Descartes' ​thought ​of perception relies on our ability to measure space through experience, in relation to our objective bodyBut how do we conceive this space in the first place? Merleau-Ponty claims that there is a primal intuition that comes from the fact that our thought acts **through** the body and not in relation to it, that allows us to found knowledge of spatial dimensions. However, as opposed to [[https://​www.youtube.com/​watch?​v=8_B-OLUVyfc|Princes Elizabeth'​s pursue]], the nature of this intuition is so primal that it cannot be conceived as a true thought. But that doesn'​t mean we cannot discuss it and speak of it, as Descartes refused to do so.
   * Descartes'​ duality opened up a chasm that sprouted two types of thoughts: Science - that skips the mind problem (or regards it as psychology) and goes straight into the abstract objective models, and an idealistic philosophy that is deep in the passive experience of //Being//.   * Descartes'​ duality opened up a chasm that sprouted two types of thoughts: Science - that skips the mind problem (or regards it as psychology) and goes straight into the abstract objective models, and an idealistic philosophy that is deep in the passive experience of //Being//.
  
thesis/book-journals/eye-mind.1535243609.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/08/26 00:33 by avnerus