phd:book-journals:communicative-action
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
phd:book-journals:communicative-action [2020/02/27 16:00] avnerus |
phd:book-journals:communicative-action [2020/03/30 11:15] avnerus |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| <poem> | <poem> | ||
| - | Only with the conceptual framework of communicative action do we gain a perspective from which the process of societal | + | //"Only with the conceptual framework of communicative action do we gain a perspective from which the process of societal |
| rationalization appears as contradictory from the start. | rationalization appears as contradictory from the start. | ||
| The contradiction arises between, on the one hand, a rationalization of everyday communication that is tied to the | The contradiction arises between, on the one hand, a rationalization of everyday communication that is tied to the | ||
| structures of inter-subjectivity of the lifeworld, in which language counts as the genuine and irreplaceable medium | structures of inter-subjectivity of the lifeworld, in which language counts as the genuine and irreplaceable medium | ||
| of reaching understanding, and, on the other hand, the growing complexity of subsystems | of reaching understanding, and, on the other hand, the growing complexity of subsystems | ||
| - | of purposive-rational action, in which actions are coordinated through steering media such as money and power. | + | of purposive-rational action, in which actions are coordinated through steering media such as money and power."// |
| </poem> | </poem> | ||
| Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
| //"A subjectivity that is characterized by communicative reason resists the denaturing of the self for the sake of self-preservation. Unlike instrumental reason, communicative reason cannot be subsumed without resistance under a blind self-preservation. It refers neither to a subject that preserves itself in relating to objects via representation and action, nor to a self-maintaining system that demarcates itself from an environment, but to a symbolically structured lifeworld that is constituted in the interpretive accomplishments of is members and only reproduced through communication. Thus communicative reason does not simply encounter ready-made subjects and systems; rather, it takes part in structuring what is to be preserved . The Utopian perspective of reconciliation and freedom is ingrained in the conditions for the communicative sociation of individuals; it is built into the linguistic mechanism of the reproduction of the species." // | //"A subjectivity that is characterized by communicative reason resists the denaturing of the self for the sake of self-preservation. Unlike instrumental reason, communicative reason cannot be subsumed without resistance under a blind self-preservation. It refers neither to a subject that preserves itself in relating to objects via representation and action, nor to a self-maintaining system that demarcates itself from an environment, but to a symbolically structured lifeworld that is constituted in the interpretive accomplishments of is members and only reproduced through communication. Thus communicative reason does not simply encounter ready-made subjects and systems; rather, it takes part in structuring what is to be preserved . The Utopian perspective of reconciliation and freedom is ingrained in the conditions for the communicative sociation of individuals; it is built into the linguistic mechanism of the reproduction of the species." // | ||
| + | |||
| + | In Volume II Habermas will develop a communicative theory of rationality, that decentralizes the focus from studies of consciousness and instrumental reason, to a rationality that is developed through communication, reaching understanding and agreement, and under the effect of steering media such as money and power. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Volume two ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Concluding Reflections: From Parsons via Weber to Marx ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | After analyzing society through new paradigms of system's theory, Habermas goes back to | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
phd/book-journals/communicative-action.txt ยท Last modified: 2020/03/30 12:16 by avnerus
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
