phd:book-journals:qualitative-research
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
phd:book-journals:qualitative-research [2020/10/19 08:27] avnerus |
phd:book-journals:qualitative-research [2020/10/21 10:31] avnerus |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| If you link to the wrong community, the new is not considered new. | If you link to the wrong community, the new is not considered new. | ||
| + | Positioning can be implicit; Even the sentence structure implies on the position, using short sentences in natural sciences, longer in economy and much longer in humanities. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Positionining can be completely explicit; State exactly where you work, who you want to influence, what is more relevant and what is less. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **60/20/20 PhD (or even 80/10/5)** | ||
| + | |||
| + | - 60% build on old research | ||
| + | - 20% appropriate other research by analogy. | ||
| + | - 20% novelty. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Clever research: say as much as possible by saying as little as possible, using positioning yourself correctly in other people's work. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ## Field research | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. Monotone description of what happened | ||
| + | 2. Interpretation | ||
| + | 3. Reflection | ||
| + | |||
| + | Background research and theory keep interplaying, careful not continue down inductive rabbit holes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Path finding checks:** Are theoretical constructs and/or research questions finding correlates in the empirical field? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ## Theory-Data relationship | ||
| + | Kurt Lewin: _"There is no nothing more practical as a good theory"_ (it guides the practice). | ||
| + | |||
| + | - Capital T theory: Encompassing, intentional, conceptual system (Newtonian physics, evolution theory..) | ||
| + | - theory / theorizing: forming concepts and articulating relationships to better discuss empirical phenomena. | ||
| + | |||
| + | // One rather abstract and broad question: Do you think that in every type of theory, even the super specific analysis of slices of of flesh in rodents, we should attach a deduction/induction into why having this theory my contribute to social and moral good. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ## Types of theory | ||
| + | 1) "What": | ||
| + | - Naming theory, description of the dimensions and characteristics of some phenomena. | ||
| + | - Classification: More elaborate naming with some structural relations (typologies, taxonomies, frameworks) | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2) "How" and "Why" theories for understanding | ||
| + | |||
| + | - Defamiliarizing (deconstructing) | ||
| + | - Sensitizing | ||
| + | - Conjectures from real world situations | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3) "What will be", theories for predicting. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | 4) "How to do" design and action theories | ||
| + | |||
| + | // My article: counts as "toward" a theory. | ||
| # An Introduction to Qualitative Research / Uwe Flick | # An Introduction to Qualitative Research / Uwe Flick | ||
phd/book-journals/qualitative-research.txt ยท Last modified: 2020/10/23 19:59 by avnerus
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
