thesis:book-journals:the-robot-in-the-garden
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
thesis:book-journals:the-robot-in-the-garden [2019/05/21 18:23] avnerus |
thesis:book-journals:the-robot-in-the-garden [2019/05/21 18:47] (current) avnerus |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| * **The embodied mind - Enactivism + mindfulness!** | * **The embodied mind - Enactivism + mindfulness!** | ||
| * Telepresence and Merleau-Ponty's maximum grip - how to get the maximum grip of something at a distance? rich feedback etc, with rich feedback we might still have the philosophical argument that we are brains in a vat, but they remain philosophical. Or do they? Maybe something is missing? | * Telepresence and Merleau-Ponty's maximum grip - how to get the maximum grip of something at a distance? rich feedback etc, with rich feedback we might still have the philosophical argument that we are brains in a vat, but they remain philosophical. Or do they? Maybe something is missing? | ||
| - | * **Borgman - Information nearness and farness - repleteness - vertical richness (VERTICAL - WEIL!), continuity - width of richness , as opposed to shallow and discontinuous [DISCRETE! SENSORS!!] ** | + | * **Borgman - Information nearness and farness - repleteness - vertical richness (VERTICAL - WEIL! Incarnation. Jesus), continuity - width of richness , as opposed to shallow and discontinuous [DISCRETE! SENSORS!!] ** |
| + | * Also risk is missing. Vulnerability. Readiness - **Merleau Ponty's Urdoxa**. | ||
| + | * Intercorporeality!! - **John Canny and Eric Paulos** | ||
| + | |||
| + | //"full-bodied presence is not just the feeling that I am present at the site of a robot I am controlling through real-time interaction. Nor is it just a question of giving robots surface sensors so that, through them as prostheses, we can touch other people without knocking them over. Even the most gentle person/robot interaction would never be a caress, nor could one successfully use a delicately controlled and touch-sensitive robot arm to give one’s kid a hug. Whatever hugs do for people, I’m quite sure tele-hugs won’t do it. And any act of intimacy mediated by any sort of prosthesis would surely be equally grotesque if not obscene."// | ||
| + | |||
| + | * What is missing relates to childhood development? Experience with the perceptual world? Or the sense of risk? | ||
thesis/book-journals/the-robot-in-the-garden.1558463036.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/05/21 18:23 by avnerus
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
