thesis:book-journals:visible-invisible
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
|
thesis:book-journals:visible-invisible [2018/08/27 14:05] avnerus |
thesis:book-journals:visible-invisible [2018/08/27 15:41] (current) avnerus |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
| * Hmm what does that say about free will? Some video about answers from the previous book [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIOU0VnocKw|here]] | * Hmm what does that say about free will? Some video about answers from the previous book [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIOU0VnocKw|here]] | ||
| * **Pages 65-68** Speaking of how we can infer //Nothing// from //Being// and //Being// from //Nothing//. In a pure manner, being is flat. no densities, or ranges of being. Nothingness is absolute. but eventually we discover that it is only in principle and "For itself is encumbered with a body, which is not outside if it is not inside, which intervenes between the For Itself and itself." - But these are all higher level speculations and significations that do not contradict the initial truth of absolute positivity and negativity - //Being and Nothingness//. | * **Pages 65-68** Speaking of how we can infer //Nothing// from //Being// and //Being// from //Nothing//. In a pure manner, being is flat. no densities, or ranges of being. Nothingness is absolute. but eventually we discover that it is only in principle and "For itself is encumbered with a body, which is not outside if it is not inside, which intervenes between the For Itself and itself." - But these are all higher level speculations and significations that do not contradict the initial truth of absolute positivity and negativity - //Being and Nothingness//. | ||
| - | * **Page 71** - About //The Other//, - There is a criticism of Sartre's view of the other as some transcendent thought or concept. This is a solipsistic view of alterity. I am a 'thought', a 'consciousness' (A subject), this is my only access to the world, and the others are my double that I have no access to. In fact - This is an //"Ambivalent or labile relationship with the other -- in which, moreover, analysis would rediscover the normal, canonical form, subjected in the particular case to a distortion that makes of the an anonymous, faceless obsession, an other in general.//" ** This sounds like Stranger Fetishism. ** | + | * **Page 71** - About //The Other//, - There is a criticism of Sartre's view of the other as some transcendent thought or concept. This is a solipsistic view of alterity. I am a 'thought', a 'consciousness' (A subject), this is my only access to the world, and the others are my double that I have no access to. In fact - This is an //"the ammbivalent or labile relationship with the other - in which, moreover, analysis would rediscover the normal, canonical form, subjected in the particular case to a distortion that makes of the other an anonymous, faceless obsession, an other in general.//" ** This sounds like Stranger Fetishism. ** |
| * There is an explanation of this in the book //Understanding Existentialism//: | * There is an explanation of this in the book //Understanding Existentialism//: | ||
| * | * | ||
thesis/book-journals/visible-invisible.1535378711.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2018/08/27 14:05 by avnerus
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
