phd:book-journals:qualitative-research
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
phd:book-journals:qualitative-research [2020/10/19 08:53] avnerus |
phd:book-journals:qualitative-research [2020/10/23 19:59] (current) avnerus |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| Positionining can be completely explicit; State exactly where you work, who you want to influence, what is more relevant and what is less. | Positionining can be completely explicit; State exactly where you work, who you want to influence, what is more relevant and what is less. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| **60/20/20 PhD (or even 80/10/5)** | **60/20/20 PhD (or even 80/10/5)** | ||
| Line 31: | Line 29: | ||
| - 20% appropriate other research by analogy. | - 20% appropriate other research by analogy. | ||
| - 20% novelty. | - 20% novelty. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Clever research: say as much as possible by saying as little as possible, using positioning yourself correctly in other people's work. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ## Field research | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. Monotone description of what happened | ||
| + | 2. Interpretation | ||
| + | 3. Reflection | ||
| + | |||
| + | Background research and theory keep interplaying, careful not continue down inductive rabbit holes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Path finding checks:** Are theoretical constructs and/or research questions finding correlates in the empirical field? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ## Theory-Data relationship | ||
| + | Kurt Lewin: _"There is no nothing more practical as a good theory"_ (it guides the practice). | ||
| + | |||
| + | - Capital T theory: Encompassing, intentional, conceptual system (Newtonian physics, evolution theory..) | ||
| + | - theory / theorizing: forming concepts and articulating relationships to better discuss empirical phenomena. | ||
| + | |||
| + | // One rather abstract and broad question: Do you think that in every type of theory, even the super specific analysis of slices of of flesh in rodents, we should attach a deduction/induction into why having this theory my contribute to social and moral good. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ## Types of theory | ||
| + | 1) "What": | ||
| + | - Naming theory, description of the dimensions and characteristics of some phenomena. | ||
| + | - Classification: More elaborate naming with some structural relations (typologies, taxonomies, frameworks) | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2) "How" and "Why" theories for understanding | ||
| + | |||
| + | - Defamiliarizing (deconstructing) | ||
| + | - Sensitizing | ||
| + | - Conjectures from real world situations | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3) "What will be", theories for predicting. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | 4) "How to do" design and action theories | ||
| + | |||
| + | // My article: counts as "toward" a theory. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ## Sampling | ||
| + | How to get representative population? Has to mirror to compound of the population. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
phd/book-journals/qualitative-research.1603097609.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2020/10/19 08:53 by avnerus
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
